Rotations
Nuclear
Rotations · Nuclear · Attendings
From the attending schedule, by days on the Nuclear and PET reading services.
Dr. David A. PerkelCardiologyNuclearPET15 days reading
Dr. Steven D. DolackyInterventional CardiologyNuclearPET14 days reading
Dr. Tyler H. CoombesCardiologyNuclearPET12 days reading
Dr. Patrick H. PlatzerCardiologyNuclearPET12 days reading
Dr. Benjamin I. SheppleCardiologyNuclearPET12 days reading
Dr. Jeffrey H. JohnsonCardiologyNuclearPET10 days reading
Dr. Joseph C. LiuCardiologyNuclearPET10 days reading
Dr. Aimee A. WehberCardiologyNuclearPET10 days reading
Dr. Eliea SneijCardiologyNuclearPET9 days reading
Dr. Peter R. ScottCardiologyNuclearPET8 days reading
Dr. Roger W. Thompson, Jr.CardiologyPET8 days reading
Dr. Carmelo V. VeneroInterventional CardiologyNuclearPET8 days reading
Dr. Janet L. EichholzCardiologyNuclear7 days reading
Dr. Anne K. KassiraCardiologyNuclearPET7 days reading
Dr. Morgan H. RandallCardiologyPET7 days reading
Dr. Emmanuel IsangCardiologyPET4 days reading
Dr. Kashif A. ShaikhCardiologyPET3 days reading
Dr. Gayathri K. BaljepallyCardiologyPET2 days reading
Dr. Joseph C. Liu
Cardiology
UTMCK · NorthshoreMay read from Northshore
Reading preferences
Unverified- When in the day they usually readNot recorded
- Whether they want studies batched or brought one at a timeNot recorded
- How much of the pre-read they want spoken versus writtenNot recorded
- Which quantitative outputs they want in front of themNot recorded
When this reader reads, and whether they want studies batched or one at a time.
Answered by: Contributed by fellows, reviewed by the program
Report structure preferences
Unverified- How they want the impression orderedNot recorded
- Which comparisons they expect in the reportNot recorded
- How risk is phrasedNot recorded
- What they want left outNot recorded
How this reader wants a report structured, and how they phrase risk.
Answered by: Contributed by fellows, reviewed by the program
Teaching style
Unverified- How they teach at the readoutNot recorded
- What they want the fellow to have decided before sitting downNot recorded
- How corrections are givenNot recorded
- Topics they teach wellNot recorded
This reader’s teaching style, and what they expect the fellow to have decided beforehand.
Answered by: Contributed by fellows, reviewed by the program
Artifact & flow preferences
Unverified- How they want attenuation and motion addressed in the readNot recorded
- When they want raw data reviewed togetherNot recorded
- Their approach to balanced ischemia and to flow quantificationNot recorded
How this reader wants artifact addressed, and their approach to flow quantification.
Answered by: Contributed by fellows, reviewed by the program
Communication preferences
Unverified- How they prefer to be reached to arrange readingNot recorded
- How to reach them when they are at a satellite clinicNot recorded
- Times of day they would rather not be calledNot recorded
- What they want telephoned rather than reportedNot recorded
How this reader prefers to be reached, and how to reach them off-site. The clinics on the card come from the Directory; the preference does not.
Answered by: Contributed by fellows, reviewed by the program
These are practical fellow-to-fellow observations, not ratings or criticism. Write them neutrally — “reads the day’s studies in one sitting after clinic” rather than a judgement — and date-stamp every one.
What is stored per attending
The structured fields, so a contributor knows what is being asked.
- Reading domain: Nuclear, PET, or bothNot recorded
- Main hospital versus satellite clinic locationsNot recorded
- Usual reading assignment and how often it is the other serviceNot recorded
- Reading and readout style, and report structure preferencesNot recorded
- Teaching style, and artifact and flow preferencesNot recorded
- Preferred method of contact, subject to permissionsNot recorded
- Last updated · contributed by · verified by · verification stateNot recorded
Every field above, for every reader: reading and report preferences, teaching style, how they want artifact and flow handled, and how they would rather be reached when they are at a satellite clinic. The reading domains and the clinics on each card come from the schedule and the Directory; nothing else on this page does.
Answered by: Contributed by fellows, reviewed by the program
Still needed from the program
Listed rather than guessed. These are the facts this page cannot answer.
- Nuclear and PET directorsWho they are, from a source that stays current. §04 names both and says in the same breath not to hard-code them — there is no directory category for either post and no schedule carries a standing one, so neither is named here.
Last updated 2026-09-24 · Program, Nuclear Work Guide specification, 2026-09-24
These guides are maintained by the fellowship. Sign in to suggest a workflow, propose an edit, or report something out of date.